Blog 6

My worldview is certainly shaped by the forms of knowledge that I privilege: one form of entertainment that shapes my worldview in a profound way is video games. I grew up in a family of programmers, and so this is why I value computer-related entertainment. An institution that I value highly is the New York Times, and in general, liberal news sources. This is because I grew up in Boulder, a very liberal town, and I truly believe in democratic ideals. I devalue conservative news sources, in contrast. I try to rely on data, and even when I find aesthetic expressions, it comes back to the views I have that are shaped by data. I didn’t include any in my “politics” section, but I could’ve found a thousand gun memes, because I believe that gun control is part of the solution to the problems we now face in America. But I engage in a form of selective reasoning in finding data to support this view, because the statistics on guns are mixed, in some cases. The same case is likely true for what I consider to be valid “experience”: choosing anecdotes that fit with my views. Aesthetic expression of experience is very effective, as I found in this project, although I most often rely on more typical journalistic sources for anecdotes. My identity is constrained by this reinforcement of views I already hold, and I don’t want to fall into the trap of the increasingly polarized political world to shape my worldview.

https://i0.wp.com/www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/PP-2014-06-12-polarization-0-01.png

And ironically in finding this media, I found a statistic that supports my view of polarized politics!

Russian Blog 2

This is a fairly typical folktale, although I tried to make it interesting. I was inspired by some of the tales we read where characters try to trick the main character into doing something dangerous, only to have that danger come back and get them. Specifically, the story where the daughter brings back a light from Baba Yaga to burn her stepmother/sisters was an inspiration.

 

Ivan the Fool lived in a small village, in a small kingdom, in a land somewhere. His life was simple: he worked, he slept, and he prayed. For many years Ivan had a poor harvest, and his neighbors laughed: “Ivan can’t even work a plow right!”, “Ivan can’t even plant the seeds right!”, “Ivan can’t even cut the grain right!”. And Ivan was sad, but he knew that if he prayed hard enough, his lot would change.

And one year, it did. While Ivan’s grain grew high into the sky, his neighbors’ crops withered, and now they no longer laughed, but looked at him with envy: “What did Ivan do to my crops?”, “He must’ve used magic to ruin me!”, “He never was right by me.”. And so Ivan’s neighbors began to scheme on how to take Ivan’s harvest for themselves, and finally hit upon a plan: There lived a Baba Yaga in the forest nearby who would eat any who came to her door, and Ivan was too stupid to know the danger.

“Ivan,” the neighbors said, “won’t you get us some wine from the old lady by the forest? We want to celebrate your great harvest, and throw a festival.” “Of course, good neighbors!” said Ivan the Fool, “I’ll soon return.” And he set out immediately. “What an idiot!” his neighbors laughed, and they began baking and cooking all sorts of extravagant foods with his harvest: soon all had been used.

Ivan wandered the forest, until he came upon a small hut, with no door he could see. “Come hut, turn for me, Ivan!” he shouted, but the hut did nothing. “Abra cadabra, hocus pocus, turn round now!” he shouted, but again, the hut did nothing. Then he spotted a window, and quickly began to squeeze through.

Inside was a Baba Yaga, her body contorted and stretched throughout the hut. Ivan very nearly shouted in fright, but calmed himself and spoke firmly, “hello grandmother, might you have some wine?” She awoke with surprise, and glared at him. “Why did you not enter through the door? Can you not see this is my home? I would have words with you at the door, and perhaps invite you in for supper.” But Ivan was steadfast: “I’m sorry grandmother, but a bottle of wine for my fellow neighbors is all I need. They sent me here to get it for a festival we will have for my bountiful harvest!” She pondered this, and finally smiled, giving him a bottle of wine for his neighbors. “Your neighbors should not have sent you to bother me so.”

And so Ivan left with the wine, and returned to the village to find the festival already underway, and his crop entirely gone. “Where is my harvest?” he cried frantically. “Relax, dear Ivan,” one of his neighbors said, having already drunk his fair share of vodka, “didn’t you want a festival?” And then Ivan knew the truth of the matter, and presented his neighbors with the bottle he had brought. “Might I share in your crops, brothers? For so many years you prospered, and now with my help you prosper still.” “No, Ivan, you fool! You can’t even work a plow.” “Or plant seeds!” “Or cut grain!” they laughed back. And then they began to pass around the wine he had brought, and eat the harvest he had reaped, and they proposed a toast, and didn’t think to include Ivan. And as they drank, they began to change, until there was nobody left but Ivan, standing among a sea of pigs. Try as he might, Ivan couldn’t find a way to turn them back, or even get them to go inside. And winter came, and they froze, and Ivan had plenty of food to spare from all his neighbors’ fields.

 

Commentary:

I tried to follow Proppian formula, although the test with Baba Yaga – not coming in the door – is a bit obscure. But I thought I preserved typical folktale form pretty well.

Exercise 4

Patient Name: Darwin N Boersma

Location: Johns Hopkins Hospital, Maryland, United States

Heart rate: 55 beats per minute

Blood Pressure: 117/76

IV Feed: Morphine and Vancomycin

Emergency Contact: Ramona Boersma (mother), 303——-

Doctor: Dr. John Doe, Pediatric Urology

Expected Time to Release: 14 days

Reflection)

Much is left out without subjectivity.

My experience of this medical recovery is almost entirely subjective: The harsh fluorescent lights hurt my eyes after so many days, and the itchy hospital bed left much to be desired. The pain of the actual surgical areas was indescribable. The nurse who was supposed to be helping me seemed to care more about the TV show at the nurse station than her job. My doctor would come by rarely, and he was good when he came, but the students under him who usually came by often contradicted him, worryingly. The bureaucracy of the hospital was staggering (as it is in every hospital I’ve ever been to), so much so that they gave me an antibiotic I’m allergic to, which was just dandy.

When you examine a catalog of facts about a human experience, much of what makes that experience powerful or emotional is left out. While you could probably tell that I had a surgery from the list I created, nothing about the quality of the experience can be gleaned: the list of facts gives the impression of a well-oiled machine of a hospital, while my subjective experience clearly shows that some parts of this machine are lacking. Like Knight says, the aesthetic is a valuable part of human experience.

blog 4

“The data gath­ered about us by our devices becomes an arti­fact that is sep­a­rate from us and can be viewed at a dis­tance. At the same time, it rep­re­sents us, or a part of our lives.”

“when I spent a lot of time reading about activity trackers

as research for this book, I started seeing ads for activity trackers on
many different sites”

I would say that if companies were to view me through my internet data, some general trends would emerge. I watch many videos about video games and sci-fi related entertainment, so a label I might be given (and then marketed towards) would be nerd. Seeing things like superhero movies pop up in my Netflix could be an example.

https://i0.wp.com/dwgyu36up6iuz.cloudfront.net/heru80fdn/image/upload/c_fill,d_placeholder_thescene.jpg,fl_progressive,g_face,h_450,q_80,w_800/v1391638562/wired_angry-nerd-the-most-famous-female-comic-book-character-is-a-franchise-flop.jpg

Another common search-term/interest might be “Liberal” as I consider myself very socially liberal and follow pages with those views.

https://i0.wp.com/www.occasionalplanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/bleedingheart2.gif

Blog 3

Anecdotal experience, filled with emotion, but which is subject to interpretation and may not be relevant to everyone, is privileged in belief stories most commonly. This is useful for moral value, and can lead people to think about their own beliefs, but if one bases their beliefs entirely on anecdotal evidence then their beliefs can be racist, or unscientific, neither of which are good.

Scientific information, that is concrete and verifiable, but devoid of moral value (not that this is the scope of the discipline), is privileged in computer science. This is the case because it needs to be the case: sciences do not exclude anecdotal, or humanistic, works because they disdain them; they exclude them because they have no use in the context of hard science. Scientists in general do not view the humanistic disciplines as “excluding” the value of technology and science, so it perplexes me why authors of some of the articles we’ve read feel that scientists don’t value humanistic pursuits as well as science. While scientific information has immense value in computer science, morality must come from elsewhere.

scientific-method

Rhetorical Analysis

In my article for Computer Science, I found that the form of argument was entirely “purpose-based” which led to a different approach to science than some other disciplines. Like in engineering, research in computer science is always done for a specific reason (i.e. to make processors faster) and the paper I read reflects this: The abstract of this paper clearly elaborates the use of the theory described within (for data recovery), and this is typical of CSCI papers. This relates to the forms of information in the field, as computer science is less interested in pure data, and more interested in how we can use this data. A great example of a science that does value “raw data” is physics, where an invention like the laser could be proposed in the 50’s and only become useful long after that. In computer science, that likely wouldn’t have been proposed (because of a lack of obvious use), and the potential benefits might be missed.

The information that we do use in CSCI is entirely scientific: this article uses both mathematical logic and scientific data to prove its theory. While this use of math is accepted in the field, and necessary for high-level discourse, it is uninviting to people outside the field, and would probably be entirely impossible to understand without some calculus background. This shows that the information used in the field shapes the desired audience. The desired audience for CSCI articles must be people with a background in CSCI, simply because that is required to understand the jargon used in this article. Also emphasizing the scientific nature of the discourse community is that there are multiple authors (working in groups to catch individual mistakes is common in science) and the format of the paper: in true scientific form CSCI papers include abstract, results, and discussion sections, and organize their data chronologically (so that someone following along can easily replicate the data or determine what went wrong). The aesthetic format of this paper also feels very scientific: the paper is in black-and-white, uses almost no visuals, and uses a Times New Roman type font, all of which give it an objective, authoritative tone.

My conclusions from this analysis are that this “purpose-based” approach to scientific study can restrict the view of scientists, possibly leading them to ignore valuable inventions, and that the amount of jargon involved in a CSCI article is overwhelming for anyone not in the field and restricts the audience greatly.

Here is the article I analyzed: http://0-dl.acm.org.libraries.colorado.edu/citation.cfm?id=1970395